Am I incorrectly sampling time?ĭ) So I tried consuming these 0x0401 messages when the diff was zero, and lo andīehold Flash would not do any animation however the background color seemed to Many, many more with twoĬ) Sometimes, I get a difference of zero in tick count between consecutiveĠx0401 messages. This has anything to do with the problem, but here's what I found:Ī) WM_TIMER messages seem to increase with complexity of swf and/or totalī) I get many WM_USER+1 (code = 0x0401) messages. ::GetTickCount()'s to measure how long between each message. With my own so I could filter windows messages. With the help of Spy++, as a test, I overrode Flash's default window procedure To update everybody, here's what I've found so far: Hate) so pleas fix this so i can use mozilla 100% all the time! This is killing my browser so i have to go to ie(which i Recently had to go to many websites with multiple flash instances(forums withįlash signatures). Render flash that isnt in view! what a good idea! I love mozilla, but i have Page to where flash isnt visible, and the cpu cycles it eats go down. In IE, you can minimize the window, or scroll down the If there are multiple instances of flash on a page, they slow down the browserĬonsiderably, this is because mozilla renders the flash even when it is not One of the main problems i've had deals with multiple instances of flash. This is why ie appears responsive while mozilla does The problem is that unlike ie, mozilla runs plugins in the Many times this takes up 100% or close cpu time in ie or mozilla, this Here are getting cpu cycles eaten up because the flash is very large on the I have researched this issue, and some of the pages posted The problem is in mozilla, and it'sĭeep down inside it.
0 kommentar(er)
